Data Flow Mapping
Document exactly where customer data goes — from SDK call to inference, storage, logs, and any upstream providers.
Attesta helps AI API, inference, and model-routing companies respond to US and EU enterprise security, privacy, procurement, and AI governance reviews with evidence-backed data handling materials.
Data Flow Diagram
Customer → API Gateway → Inference Endpoint → Logging Layer
No-Training Evidence
Vendor policy + provider terms + configuration evidence
Logging & Retention
Retention period, region, access controls, deletion path
Model Provider Disclosure
Upstream providers, regions, subprocessors, pass-through terms
Jurisdictional Access Risk
Data location, support access, residual risks
The problem
Once procurement, security, privacy, or AI governance teams enter the conversation, the questions get specific — and your answers need evidence, not slide decks. Reviews can delay deals for weeks when answers are scattered across engineering, legal, provider documentation, and internal policies.
01Where is customer data processed and stored?
02Are prompts, outputs, files, or metadata used for training?
03Which upstream model providers process customer data?
04How long are logs retained?
05Who can access customer data or logs?
06Can China-based or Asia-based personnel access customer data?
07Does customer data enter China or other sensitive jurisdictions?
08Who is responsible for security, privacy, model behavior, misuse, and incidents?
09Can you provide evidence, not just statements?
What Attesta does
Attesta works from the buyer's actual questions, your architecture, cloud setup, model providers, contracts, policies, and available evidence — then prepares clear materials that security, privacy, procurement, and AI governance teams can review. No generic template.
Document exactly where customer data goes — from SDK call to inference, storage, logs, and any upstream providers.
Compile contract clauses, provider statements, and configuration evidence behind your no-training claim.
Clear logging matrix: what is logged, where, who can access, and for how long — with deletion paths.
Disclose upstream models, regions, processors, and sub-processors in a format enterprise reviewers expect.
Explicit boundaries between vendor, customer, model provider, and infrastructure — for security and incidents.
Address concerns about Asia-based personnel access, jurisdictional exposure, and supplier risk — with controls.
Draft buyer-specific DDQ responses across security, privacy, and AI governance frameworks.
When to use Attesta
Most of these conversations start the same way: a security questionnaire shows up, the deal slows down, and the team starts rebuilding answers from scattered engineering notes, provider documentation, contracts, and internal policies.
Deliverables
Each engagement is scoped around the buyer review in front of you, not a generic compliance product roadmap.
Rapid review of the buyer's questionnaire, blocker email, procurement request, or DDQ.
Outputs
Buyer-specific packet prepared after evidence intake.
Typical modules
Retainer support for repeat enterprise buyer reviews.
Includes
How it works
Buyer Review → Evidence Intake → Trust Packet → Review & Escalation → Reusable Trust File.
Send us the questionnaire, blocker email, or DDQ. We map what is being asked.
We work with your engineering, security, and legal contacts to pull real evidence.
We assemble a buyer-specific trust packet — clear, evidence-backed, reviewer-ready.
Internal review, then flag any item needing legal, privacy, or security escalation.
Reusable trust file kept current for the next buyer review — without starting over.
Scope
Attesta may identify export-control, restricted-party, or entity-list exposure as a trust review input, but formal legal advice, transaction-level screening, or regulated financial compliance should be handled by qualified specialists.
Important boundaries
Attesta prepares trust materials based on vendor-provided information, architecture, contracts, cloud configurations, policies, and available evidence.
Attesta does not independently certify vendor claims. Buyer-facing claims must be supported by vendor-provided evidence and vendor confirmation before submission.
Security posture
Customer materials are handled through confidentiality workflows and used only for the agreed engagement scope.
Materials can be maintained in restricted-access workspaces with access limited to the engagement team.
Client documents inform an evidence-based review — not generic templates or unverifiable statements.
Where applicable, materials can be handled under NDA and deleted or returned on request after the engagement.
Formal third-party security attestations will be added as Attesta scales.
Final step
Send us the buyer's questionnaire, security review, procurement request, or blocker email. We'll identify what the buyer is asking, what evidence is available, what is missing, and what response packet is needed.
hello@getattesta.co